Screen

Profile

Direction

Menu Style

Cpanel
Wednesday, 06 July 2011 08:48

Marriage Saving in Court: Ohio's Conciliation of Marital Controversies

Written by  KEVIN SENICH
Rate this item
(4 votes)
Ohio is a very marriage friendly state. We even have a statute to prove it. Its official title is “Ohio Revised Code (ORC), Title 31. Domestic Relations – Children, Chapter 3117. Conciliation of Marital Controversies.” An entire chapter of the domestic relations code dedicated to saving marriages? A law where people go to court to SAVE their marriages? It really is true.

 The procedure works this way: Before or after a divorce action is filed, you, your spouse or both of you can file a petition with the court either to preserve your marriage through reconciliation, or to amicably settle any issue between the two of you and avoid further litigation. User friendly forms are provided, and happy, friendly deputy clerks will make sure you have everything needed to file. And if you forgot your wallet, don’t worry. The process is free. That’s right, no filing fees and no charges for any other help you may need along the way.   A simple cost-free petition and you are immediately on your way to Conciliation Court with your own Conciliation Judge.

 Conciliation Judges are very special judges. They insist on conducting their proceedings informally. They can have their hearings anywhere they want within the jurisdiction of the county court. Ostensibly under the statute they can even hold hearings in your own home, although I think most Conciliation Judges draw the line at making house calls. Two lawyers are welcome, but one lawyer is not. If one side is represented and the other is not, the one lawyer is politely asked to get lost.

If you don’t like having your dirty family laundry hung out on the public laundry line known as the divorce court, Conciliation Court is likely the place for you. There your privacy is paramount, your hearings are private and your file is closed, shut tight. The only way the file can be opened is for the Conciliation Judge to order it opened.
          
 Suppose your spouse has already sued you for divorce, and you really don’t want to upset her or him any more than they already are. Instead of filing a Petition for Conciliation on your own, the divorce court judge can do it for you. The divorce judge can do it at any time, one would think even the day of trial.   To transfer your divorce to conciliation, the divorce judge only has to make a finding that the transfer “may prevent dissolution of the marriage or disruption of the household”.   Given that you would otherwise be divorced for certain, the finding is obvious, something any divorce judge could find without really having to look very hard.

Children are especially welcome in Ohio’s Conciliation Court. Whenever a minor child’s welfare may be “affected by the parents’ controversy”, the Conciliation Judge must entertain any petition properly brought before him or her.  
  
Perhaps the most important part of the statute is the “stay”. While you are in Conciliation Court, there is simply no way your spouse can divorce you. If a divorce action has already been filed, it is put on hold at least until 30 days after your conciliation process is over.   
   
 The Ohio Conciliation Court is as close to a panacea for saving marriages on the brink of divorce as any procedure ever enacted into law. Ohio should be congratulated. With the often cited figure of 30% of divorcing couples being reconcilable, one can just imagine a conciliation docket crowded with husbands and wives all too eager to try every last option before finally calling their marriages quits. The uncounted thousands of would-have-been-divorced people who have benefited from this procedure to go on to lead strengthened and productive married lives undoubtedly thank every day those wise legislators who gave them this option when divorce seemed the only way out. 
       
Those legislators understood a profound truth. Marriage, not just divorce, needs its day in court.   
   
I wish this was the happy ending to this story. I wish.    
    
Of course, the Ohio Conciliation Court really exists, at least in one sense. But, in the other important sense, it just doesn’t. Those uncounted thousands? They really are uncounted because, much to my disappointment and the best of my knowledge, in the forty plus years of the statute’s existence, no county in Ohio has ever seated a Conciliation Judge. ORC 3117.01 states in pertinent part:

 "Chapter 3117 of the Revised Code is applicable only in counties in which the court of common  pleas determines that social conditions and the number of domestic  relations cases in the county render the conciliation procedures provided necessary to proper consideration of such cases or to effectuate conciliation of marital  controversies. (ORC 3117.01)"


Therefore, as regards saving marriages, I have to admit that my home state has shown a remarkable lack of determination, or lack of a determination. Despite the rising divorce rate, the free-falling marriage rate, the out-of-wedlock birthrate approaching 40%, custody and support problems that leave too many mothers in poverty and too many fathers in jail, and the absolute devastation with which all of the above “affects” children --- despite all this, no Ohio county has ever instituted ORC Chapter 3117.   One has to wonder, in what century will “social conditions render the conciliation procedures … necessary”?

The Conciliation of Marital Controversies exists in Ohio, but only on the pages of the Ohio Revised Code.    This is sad for marriage, tragic for children.
Last modified on Thursday, 07 July 2011 11:17
KEVIN SENICH

KEVIN SENICH

Kevin Senich received his AB from the University of Michigan with distinction in honors history, and his JD from Cleveland-Marshall College of Law of Cleveland State University. As a practicing attorney and principal of Kevin J. M. Senich, LLC, he concentrates in the areas of family law and civil litigation. He is admitted to practice in all the courts of the State of Ohio, several federal district courts, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, among other jurisdictions.

For over twenty years Kevin has corresponded and consulted with pro-marriage groups and individuals on legal matters related to divorce and divorce process. His practical scholarship includes appellate cases construing Ohio statutes as regards “cause” for divorce, “equal division of marital property” and “financial misconduct”. He has appeared on radio shows and has spoken locally and nationally on topics related to divorce law and its effect on marital relations and fathers’ rights, and has addressed committees of the Ohio Legislature on divorce reform. He is a former committee member of the family law sections of several bar associations as well as the National Lawyers Association.

15 comments

  • Comment Link BEVERLY WILLETT Thursday, 07 July 2011 12:47 posted by BEVERLY WILLETT

    Kevin,

    When I first read this, my heart stopped. It was too good to be true. From personal experience and speaking with others who have put their faith in our judicial system I knew the letdown we have all had to face when we've finally had to accept the truth -- our judicial system has no interest in marriage preservation. Turns out, Ohio's system was too good to be true. And what a waste. We can all sit around shaking our heads or finally start to do something to turn the tide. I know that's what you and I and others at the Coalition for Divorce Reform are trying to do. Thanks for this great piece. Beverly Willett

  • Comment Link Kenda-Ruth Thursday, 07 July 2011 18:15 posted by Kenda-Ruth

    Too good too bee true, yeah. I so had my hopes up when reading this. I was expecting it to be little used and was thinking that may be due to lack of promottion--people just didn't know it was available. But then I see, simply existing is not the same as availability.

    So that must mean that a person who tries to access this is turned down? Has anyone tried?

  • Comment Link LORI LOWE Thursday, 07 July 2011 20:59 posted by LORI LOWE

    Intriguing. Where is the public outcry? Imagine the potential if just one county successfully provided as described. Sad that we all know there is a catch while we're reading. And a big catch at that.

  • Comment Link KEVIN SENICH Friday, 08 July 2011 10:20 posted by KEVIN SENICH

    Beverly:

    Clearly a lot of thought went into the creation of Ohio's conciliation statute. The fatal flaw was that the Ohio legislature created a procedure the implementation of which was left to the discretion of the courts. It seems that courts universally exercise their discretion against marriage, and in favor of divorce.

  • Comment Link KEVIN SENICH Friday, 08 July 2011 10:38 posted by KEVIN SENICH

    Kenda-Ruth:

    I do not know of anyone who has tried to file a petition for reconciliation. In present circumstances, that filing would be futile since the judges of the court have not made the determination that is necessary to effectuate the process. Until they do, we have no Conciliation Court.
    Perhaps one day some brave soul will file an action in mandamus or a writ of prohibition forcing the judges to make such a determination. Even so, the judges may determine the conciliation court is just "not necessary".

  • Comment Link KEVIN SENICH Friday, 08 July 2011 13:57 posted by KEVIN SENICH

    Lori:

    Sorry. No public outcry. The statute is obscure, even to lawyers and judges. My unofficial poll of county judicial candidates for the general division in the last election was revealing. None knew about it.
    I presume the judges in the domestic relations division know about it. Since I believe those judges are aware of the statute, my only understanding would be that they would not want it implemented.
    Domestic relations judges and lawyers would have most reason to know about the statute. I do not know why these groups have not pushed for its implementation. My best guess is that they do not see themselves as being involved in the reconciliation business.

  • Comment Link KGL Sunday, 24 July 2011 21:07 posted by KGL

    Sorry, but I don't buy 'they knew nothing about the statue.' Perhaps the issue of turning a blind eye from the statute is more about maintaining the status quo,that is, divorce is a billion dollar industry-shifting marital assets from the pockets of families to lawyers. States obtain fed. funds for every dollar of child-support ordered and there are huge incentives from the federal gov. to fund the states (via Title IV D for starters), and we wonder wx judges 'knew' if a reconciliation stat. existed? The research that I have conducted shows that no-fault is unconstitutional and few if any lawyers or judges are willing to take up the issue. Why?
    KGL

  • Comment Link KEVIN SENICH Tuesday, 26 July 2011 17:08 posted by KEVIN SENICH

    KGL: It is a virtual certainty that some judges and lawyers are purposely ignorant of this statute. Blame no-fault. For forty years judges have been judging themselves based on how quickly and efficiently they can divorce people. They see themselves as facilitators of divorce, not as arbiters of marital justice much less guardians of a public trust charged with the protection of the institution of marriage. In this context it is incomprehensible to them that legal process could contemplate reconciliation. Divorce will remain a growth industry as long as society wants it so to be. The only question is whether the divorce industry is immoral or merely amoral like any other industry. Does it knowingly profit from the unnecessary destruction of families and the misery of broken lives, or is it ... just business?

  • Comment Link bob Friday, 05 August 2011 16:00 posted by bob

    It was after long discussion and me asking my attorney if there was any other options that he told me of conciliation. It was like a weight was lifted. I am so glad I am in OH. My wife is in FL with our 2 kids and 1 of her kids from a previous marriage. If she is willing to come here for conciliation, we may still have a chance. She cannot bring the children, however. We have a lot of family down there they can stay with. My question is can she just fly up for meetings/couselling or does she have to stay here and for how long. Right now, this seems to be a major tipping point between us as well as our attorneys. Are the rules regarding this to be determined by the courts or by our requests? Thanks

  • Comment Link KEVIN SENICH Sunday, 07 August 2011 16:46 posted by KEVIN SENICH

    Bob:

    I am not sure whether your attorney is referring to the statutory, in-court conciliation process or a private out-of-court conciliation. I know of no Ohio counties that have in-court conciliation. If your’s does, I will be very happy to learn that. Cuyahoga County (Cleveland), for example, certainly does not have it. To make matters more confusing, some counties like Cuyahoga have what is called "Family Conciliation Services (FCS)" to which parties may be referred after filing a divorce action. But, FCS has nothing to do with marriage conciliation; it's about getting parties to be more cooperative in their divorce.
    Assuming your county does have the statutory, in-court marital conciliation process, then clearly your wife will have to come to that county if you file a Petition for Conciliation. If, (as I suspect) your attorney is talking about private conciliation, that can be done whenever, wherever and however you may agree with your wife.

Leave a comment

**This website will not share or publish your email address

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated.
Basic HTML code is allowed.

You are here: Home